Reviewer Byron G Smith
Great for treadmill.
Reviewer Dan Benjoseph
Good walking shoes--could be a bit wider!
Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer D Scharlotte
The most comfortable shoe I have worn in my life. Really..no kidding!
Reviewer Jeremy L Osborn
These shoes are incredibly comfortable. They super soft and springy and so far have been great for walking/hiking!
I suggest ordering a half a size as they ran a bit large.
Reviewer J Eagleton
Lots of GI Joes for the price. Bought as a gift. Have not given it yet, but sure he will love it.
Reviewer Tony Monchinski
I just love these shoes. First pair came from Shoes.com and this pair were cheaper. Really comfortable when I do my 3 mile walk. I alternate shoes for my walk nothing is wrong with the shoes they are great.
Reviewer chev chase
wearing these around my apartment, they seem like well made, good quality sneakers that offer a lot of foot support and comfort despite being a low budget edition of this famous brand, However, they are still new and questions about stretching and durability remain unanswered.
Reviewer thoughtful6
These shoes really hold up well and have lasted my husband a really long time. Longer than any sneaker he has ever own. Very pleased.
Reviewer B Kole
Very comfortable straight out of the box. I wear mens 5.5; I ordered Euro 39 (mens 5-5.5) and these are just a little long in the toes. But the toe is a little pointy, which accounts for the perception that they are long for the size. The arch support is in exactly the right place. The heel cup and width are great, soles are comfortable. The color and look is great, I can wear these with jeans on the weekends or with wool trousers at the office. And the traction on packed snow is pretty good. The only thing I would like to change, I can't. I do not much care for the wide, flat shoelaces. To me they look a little sloppy on these shoes. But the forward eyelets are thin slots, so your options are limited in replacing the laces.
Show16-
160(Results:
1852)
English
