Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer David Wickre
Never had vans before, thought I would give them a try. They are very well made and sturdy. The only reason I gave them 4 stars was the first day I wore them I got a blister on the back of my heel from them. Hopefully I can break them in with no more blisters! I really like the shoes so I hope they work out!
Reviewer K Cirillo
I have the black shoes. They are super “plain”, but that’s something that I really like about them. Just black-and-white, with the Lacoste logo on the side. They are leather uppers with a rubber sole. They have some arch support inside. The inside padding is “reasonable”. Due to the rubber sole, they are not super lightweight, but also not too heavy. These shoes are Made in Vietnam, so at the current starting price of seventy-five bucks is a bit steep, but they are quite nice overall.
Reviewer J LeClaire
Received these shoes quickly. These shoes are a bit expensive for me. However, if they stay the way
they are, comfort and last for a reasonable time period, they're worth every penny. I have found no
fault with these shoes. The way things are now with them, I would buy them again. Not much that
I can tell you, just got them today. There were NO reviews when I ordered them, I had to take a chance.
So far, I am elated and satisfied that I bought them. At least, you have one true review to assist you
in your decision...
Reviewer James Obrien
Fits as expected but remember converse sizes are one size off. Dont just buy them unless you know what size converse you are.
Reviewer Souljahs
These shoes look great and feel comfy. I love how the give out two looks, causal and dressy too. They really go with anything, the only thing is that they do not give a great arch support, but nothing any support insoles can't fix.
Reviewer C B Hockaday
after terrible experience with merrell's proterra model these are surprisingly ... perfect
Reviewer Angelia
love the zippers. good product, fair price.
Reviewer GJFreese
basic-- easy to wear
Reviewer Mastermoten
Narrow fit but classic look.
Show47-
470(Results:
2575)
English
