Reviewer K Apathy
Awesome! Looks great, feels great.
Reviewer Jo Manning
I like the shoes. Quality and they look good. Relatively inexpensive and stylish.
Reviewer samuelh
These are converse shoes. They will fit exactly like all converse shoes will. I'm usually a size 5 womens, it recommended get the size 3, I got the size 3, the size 3 fit.
Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer wildasthesea
Single parent working father needed a decent shoe that was not going to fall apart but also look not too bad this shoe fit the bill for both the price was pretty good
Reviewer C Maltese
These shoes are a little wider than normal, but if you have a shoe stretcher, you can also stretch them to fit. Very comfortable. I use them for running and really like them because they have no decorative straps on the side which can can cause pressure points around the ball of the foot. Highly recommend these to anyone.
Reviewer Katie Holland
Good supportive athletic shoe for the moderate price. My husband has been wearing these for about 5 years now, multiple pairs!
Reviewer Laura Logan
COOL DESIGN AND PERFECT FIT
Reviewer Finn Gregory
Styling is pleasing and they are exceptionally comfortable.
Reviewer L Ciani
While I had never heard of this brand I decided to give them a shot to see what I thought about them.
I found that these shoes fit true to size and are incredibly comfortable. The mesh like fabric allows airflow keeping your feet from getting too hot while still providing ample support.
I have used these over the last few months and they have held up very well, performed excellently and quickly became a go to pair of shoes when I knew I was going to the gym or to be on my feet most of the day.
I have been very pleased with these sneakers and would not hesitate to recommend them or purchase another pair from this brand. The price is amazing for the quality of this shoe.
Show58-
580(Results:
1310)
English
