Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer Hiten Data
They fit well, but as these style shoes does not have arch support, I use an arch support that you can get from store (about $12/pair) and these shoes are so comfortable and fits well. I am generally a men's size 12, but with these men's size 11 work perfect. Not to mention they are awesome looking shoes.
Reviewer Jay A Wescott
I like these shoes a lot. They are super light weight. They look good and feel good. I have a very wide foot. My predecessors to these shoes were almost as expensive, and I ended up "blowing out" the sides of both shoes because of my wide feet. There is a little bit of slop in these shoes, but I ordered them 1/2 size bigger to be able to wear 2 pairs of socks with these in the winter. With 2 pairs of socks, these are as close to perfect as I could hope for. I paid about $35 with prime. If these "blow out", I will report back, but I think they are going to be just fine.
Reviewer Afterhotshoes
Husband thought I was nuts to order these for him. But I forced him to pull them on (they don't tie) and after walking around for 10 minutes he said he really thought they are comfortable and cushion his walk on our hard tile floors.
Reviewer willowtree
Nice quality and price. Fast delivery AA++
Reviewer C Carlile
Seems to be overpriced.
Fits Perfectly
Decent Material
Comfortable
Reviewer L Griffin
Great hat, good fit.
Reviewer M Arrick
Just like the pair I bought 5 years ago that are now falling apart. Love them. The old ones never blew out on the sides like my shoes tend to do with my snowshoe shaped feet.
Reviewer Carolina Sunshine
Awesome lightweight and sturdy shoe
Reviewer M Wheatfall
These fit great on my husband. They are pretty true to size as far as the fit goes. He finds them comfortable to wear for extended periods of time. They offer adequate support for normal day to day activity. They're nice looking enough that he can wear them to work with a pair of khakis and a casual button down shirt. They are a little more trendy than what he usually wears, but it looks fine on him.
Show70-
700(Results:
1455)
English
